Integrated wavelength locker

ABSTRACT

Described are various configurations of integrated wavelength lockers including asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometers (AMZIs) and associated detectors. Various embodiments provide improved wavelength-locking accuracy by using an active tuning element in the AMZI to achieve an operational position with high locking sensitivity, a coherent receiver to reduce the frequency-dependence of the locking sensitivity, and/or a temperature sensor and/or strain gauge to computationally correct for the effect of temperature or strain changes.

PRIORITY

This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. ProvisionalApplication Ser. No. 62/406,351, filed Oct. 10, 2016, which isincorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The p disclosure relates generally to wavelength lockers for photonicintegrated circuits (PICs), and more particularly to integratedwavelength lockers.

BACKGROUND

Optical communications links often require optical wavelength alignmentwithin a specified grid. For this purpose, bulk-optic or fiber-coupledsingle-etalon external wavelength lockers have been used to provide awavelength reference; however, these external lockers tend to beexpensive, have large volumes (e.g., greater than 100 mm³), and limitthe architecture of the PIC. Integrated wavelength lockers fabricatedon-chip at the wafer-scale are highly desirable as they require lessvolume, can be fabricated with the other integrated photonic componentsat low cost in high volume, and enable functional architectures for thePIC that are more power efficient. The performance of conventionalintegrated wavelength lockers is, however, insufficient for manyproducts. Fabrication variations, for example, can decrease the lockingsensitivity and/or its predictability, and temperature fluctuations andstrains imposed post-fabrication can reduce the locking accuracy.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an example wavelength-locking system inaccordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 2A is a schematic diagram of an example wavelength locker includingan asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer (AMZI) and a single detector,in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 2B is a graph of the photocurrent measured, for a wavelength lockeras shown in FIG. 2A, as a function of frequency, in accordance withvarious embodiments.

FIG. 2C is a schematic diagram of an example wavelength locker includingan AMZI with a balanced receiver, in accordance with variousembodiments.

FIG. 2D is a graph of the individual and balanced photocurrents measuredfor the wavelength locker of FIG. 2C as a function of frequency, inaccordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 2E is a schematic diagram of an example wavelength locker includingan AMZI with an active tuning element and a balanced receiver, inaccordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 3A is a schematic diagram of an example wavelength locker includingan AMZI with a 90-degree hybrid receiver, in accordance with variousembodiments.

FIG. 3B is a graph of the individual in-phase and quadraturephotocurrents measured for the wavelength locker of FIG. 3A as afunction of frequency, in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 3C is a graph of the balanced in-phase and quadrature photocurrentsmeasured for the wavelength locker of FIG. 3A as a function offrequency, in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 3D is a graph of the AMZI filter phase computed from the measuredin-phase and quadrature photocurrents of FIG. 3C as a function offrequency, in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 4A is a schematic diagram of a wavelength locker including coarseand fine filters each including an AMZI with a 90-degree hybridreceiver, in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 4B is a schematic diagram of a wavelength locker including coarseand fine filters each including an AMZI with an active tuning element inone interferometer arm, in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 5A is a graph of the filter transmission as a function of relativewavelength at temperatures of 30° C., 53° C., and 85° C., respectively,for a silicon/silicon-nitride-(Si/SiNx)-based athermal AMZI inaccordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 5B is a graph of the wavelength-dependent residual athermality ofan Si/SiNx-based athermal AMZI in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 6 is a graph of the athermality of the residual athermality of anSi/SiNx-based athermal AMZI in accordance with various embodiments for arange of temperatures and wavelengths.

FIG. 7A is a flow chart illustrating an example method for calibratingan integrated wavelength locker with a coherent receiver, in accordancewith various embodiments.

FIG. 7B is a flow chart illustrating an example method for operating anintegrated wavelength locker with a coherent receiver, in accordancewith various embodiments.

FIG. 8A is a flow chart illustrating an example method for calibratingan integrated wavelength locker with an AMZI including a heater in oneinterferometer arm, in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 8B is a flow chart illustrating an example method for operating anintegrated wavelength locker with an AMZI including a heater in oneinterferometer arm, in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 9 is a flow chart illustrating an example method of manufacturingand assembling a multi-chip integrated wavelength locker module, inaccordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 10A is a schematic cross-sectional view of an exampleimplementation of a PIC with an integrated wavelength locker on asilicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate, in accordance with variousembodiments.

FIG. 10B is a schematic cross-sectional view of an exampleimplementation of a PIC with an integrated wavelength locker on acompound semiconductor substrate, in accordance with variousembodiments.

FIG. 10C is a schematic cross-sectional view of the exampleimplementation of a PIC with an integrated wavelength locker of FIG.10A, further illustrating metal deposits for a heater and sensors, inaccordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 10D is a simplified schematic cross-sectional view of a multi-chipmodule including a PIC and electronic control chip, in accordance withvarious embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure provides, in various embodiments, configurations,methods of manufacture, and methods of operation of integratedwavelength lockers that possess improved operational performance and aresuitable for use across wide ambient temperature ranges and in standardpackaging environments. In general, in accordance herewith, thefrequency (and, thus, the wavelength) of an on-chip light source (e.g.,laser or tunable light emitting diode (LED)) is “locked,” that is, setto a desired “locking position,” based on the periodicfrequency-dependent optical response of an on-chip AMZI, as measured,e.g., with one or more photodetectors.

The sensitivity of the response at an output of the AMZI (herein also“the locking sensitivity”) is generally frequency-dependent, and whilethe AMZI can be designed for maximum sensitivity at a given lockingposition (or, equivalently, locking frequency), fabrication variationscan cause the frequency of maximum locking sensitivity to shift and,thus, reduce the sensitivity at the desired locking frequency. Variousembodiments correct for such degradation in the locking sensitivity,achieving, in some instances, an accuracy and stability of the lockingfrequency corresponding to a frequency uncertainty of less than 50 GHz.In some embodiments, the integrated wavelength locker includes a heateror other active tuning element (e.g., made of a semiconductor such asdoped silicon, indium phosphide (InP), or gallium arsenide (GaAs)) inone arm of the AMZI, which allows for adjustments to theoptical-path-length difference between the two interferometer arms thatplace the desired locking frequency within a range of high lockingsensitivity. In other embodiments, an output coupler of the AMZIgenerates multiple interference signals that differ in the relativephase shifts imparted between the interfering signals and may becombined to obtain a response with a locking sensitivity and accuracythat are significantly less frequency-dependent (or, in someembodiments, nearly frequency-independent) and, thus, less affected byfabrication variations. For example, in certain embodiments, the outputcoupler provides four output ports and, together with four respectivephotodetectors at the output ports, forms a 90-degree optical hybridreceiver for measuring balanced in-phase and quadrature signals. Moregenerally, the output coupler of the AMZI and two or more photodetectorsmay be configured to collectively provide a “coherent receiver,” thatis, a receiver that generates and measures interference signals thatdiffer by a known value that is not a multiple of 180° in the relativephase shifts imparted between the respective pair of signals beinginterfered to form the interference signal. Herein, the relative phaseshift imparted (prior to interference) between two signals beinginterfered is the sum of the phase difference incurred in theinterferometer arms of the AMZI and an additional relative phase shiftimparted by the output coupler. As between two interference signals,these additional relative phase shifts, and thus the (total) relativeshifts between the signals being interfered differ in a coherentreceiver. In addition to rendering the locking sensitivity lessfrequency-dependent or even nearly frequency-independent, coherentreceivers enable determining the phase difference incurred in theinterferometer arms of the AMZI between the two interfering signals(hereinafter also the “filter phase”) uniquely within a full period ofthe AMZI (herein also “filter period”).

Apart from fabrication variations, the response of an AMZI can also beaffected by fluctuations in the temperature or by mechanical strain.While the effect of temperature can be significantly reduced by choosingmaterials and dimensions that render the AMZI athermal, a residualtemperature dependence remains. In various embodiments, therefore,compensation for changes in the temperature is achieved at least in partcomputationally, based on temperature measurements with one or moretemperature sensors included in the wavelength locker at or near theAMZI. Similarly, mechanical strains, which can be inducedpost-fabrication due to, e.g., handling, mounting, and installation ofthe PIC as well as aging, are measured, in accordance with someembodiments, with one or more strain gauges at or near the AMZI toenable computational corrections for strain-induced effects. Temperatureand/or strain measurement and compensation in accordance herewith canfurther improve the wavelength-locking accuracy.

Since the response of an AMZI is periodic in frequency, it allows thefrequency position (and, thus, wavelength) of the light source to bedetermined only within a given filter period of the AMZI, or, in otherwords, up to multiples of the filter period. This is insufficient if thefrequency of the light source can vary by more than a filter period. Insome embodiments, this deficiency is overcome by combining two or moreAMZIs and associated detectors (e.g., including heaters or 90-degreehybrid receivers) into a two-stage or multi-stage integrated wavelengthlocker. In a two-stage wavelength locker, the AMZI in one stage acts asa coarse filter to allow the frequency of the incoming light to belocated within one of the periods of the AMZI in the other stage, andthat second AMZI serves as a finer filter to determine the frequencywithin the determined filter period.

The foregoing will be more readily understood from the followingdetailed description of various embodiments, in particular, when takenin conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The description isstructured into multiple sub-titled sections that focus on differentaspects of the disclosed subject matter. It is to be understood,however, that embodiments may combine aspects or features from thevarious sections. For example, both wavelength lockers with activetuning elements in an interferometer arm and wavelength lockers withcoherent receivers can benefit from the direct measurement andcompensation for temperature or mechanical strain, and can be staged toincrease the locking range without detriment to the locking accuracy.

System Overview and Operating Principle

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an example wavelength-locking system100, in accordance with various embodiments, for locking the frequencyof a tunable light source 102. The system 100 includes a wavelengthlocker 104 and associated electronic processing circuitry 106 and memory108. To lock the frequency of the light source 102, light is coupledfrom the light source 102 into an AMZI 110 of the wavelength locker 104.At the output of the AMZI 110, an output coupler 112 generates one ormore optical interference signals that are measured with detectors 114(e.g., photodetectors that generate photocurrents proportional to theintensity of the detected light). Various configurations of the outputcoupler 112 and detectors 114, which together form the receiver 116 ofthe wavelength locker 104, are described herein below. Electronicsignals capturing the measurements are transmitted to the electronicprocessing circuitry 106, where they can be processed to compute afilter phase of the AMZI 110 (or other filter parameters correlated withthe filter phase).

During calibration of the wavelength-locking system 100, light of adesired locking frequency is input to the wavelength locker 104, and themeasured photocurrents and/or the filter phase (or other filterparameters) derived therefrom are stored in memory 108 as a targetfilter phase (or, more generally, target filter parameters). Duringsubsequent wavelength-locking of the light source 102, the stored targetfilter parameter(s) can be retrieved from memory 108 for comparison withthe filter parameter(s) measured at that time, and, based on thecomparison, feedback can be provided to the light source 102.Alternatively or additionally to using target filter parameters,calibration may involve tuning an active tuning element in thewavelength locker 104 (such as a power setting of an integrated heater)to achieve specified photocurrents, and storing the setting(s) of theactive tuning element (e.g., a heater power setting) in memory 108 astarget settings; the wavelength locker 104 is then operated inaccordance with these target settings to lock the frequency of the lightsource 102. Optionally, in accordance with various embodiments, thewavelength locker 104 may include a temperature sensor 118 and/or straingauge 120 at or near the AMZI 110, allowing the temperature and strainof the AMZI 110 to be measured prior to wavelength-locking the lightsource 102, and to be compensated for computationally based oncomparison with respective temperature and strain values stored inmemory 108 at calibration time.

As described in more detail below with respect to FIGS. 9-10B, thewavelength locker 104 may be integrated with the light source 102 on asingle PIC. The processing circuitry 106 and memory 108 may be providedon the same chip, or on a separate electronic control chip. If thelatter, the PIC and electronic control chip may be packaged into amulti-chip wavelength-locker module. Alternatively, the processingcircuitry 106 and memory 108 may be provided, in whole or in part, in anexternal device.

FIG. 2A is a more detailed schematic diagram of an example AMZI 200,illustrating the principle of wavelength locking in accordance withvarious embodiments. The AMZI 200 includes two interferometer arms 202,204 with different optical path lengths, imparting generally differentrespective phase shifts on light propagating through the two arms 202,204. The light is coupled into, and split between, the twointerferometer arms 202, 204 by an input coupler 205. At the output ofthe AMZI 200, recombination and interference of the light by an outputcoupler 206 produces an optical response, measurable with a suitableoptical detector 208, that depends on the relative phase shift betweenthe interferometer arms 202, 204 (that is, the filter phase), and thusvaries periodically in frequency. The periodicity in frequency, which isalso called the “free spectral range (FSR)” of the interferometer, isinversely proportional to the optical-path-length difference between thetwo arms 202, 204.

FIG. 2B illustrates the frequency-dependent optical response 209, asmeasured by a single photodetector (such as detector 208) as an inducedphotocurrent, of an AMZI having an FSR of 100 GHz. (The depictedfrequency is taken relative to some absolute frequency value.) Thephotocurrent/is proportional to the detected power P_(det) (theresponsivity R of the detector being the proportionality factor), whichis a function of the input power P_(in) and the relative phase shift, orfilter phase, φ_(filter) between the two interferometer arms:

$I = {{RP}_{\det} = {\frac{1}{2}P_{i\; n}{R\left( {1 + {\cos\;\varphi_{filter}}} \right)}}}$The optical response of the AMZI can be calibrated against a knownexternal wavelength reference, such as a precise calibration laser orfilter, and thereafter used as an integrated optical reference.Calibration may involve tuning the on-chip laser until it matches theexternal wavelength reference, and recording the resulting photocurrentin memory. After deployment in the field, deviations of the measuredphotocurrent from the recorded value can be used as feedback tostabilize the laser wavelength.

As can be seen in FIG. 2B, the locking sensitivity, that is, thesensitivity of the measured transmitted power (or photocurrent or otherAMZI response 209) to changes in frequency of the light source, whichcorresponds to the slope dP_(det)/df of the frequency-dependent power,varies itself with frequency, and is maximum at the filter mid-point,where the power (or photocurrent) is at half its peak value.Accordingly, the filter mid-point is the optimal locking position.Conversely, when the desired locking frequency is at the peak or null,the slope is zero, and thus the locking sensitivity is poor, causingdegraded wavelength-locking accuracy. In addition, around the peak ornull, the frequency determination can be ambiguous in certain systemconfigurations, as frequency changes of a given magnitude in eitherdirection from the peak or null result in the same photocurrent and are,thus, indistinguishable absent frequency dithering of the light source(which would allow determining the slope of the photocurrent as afunction of frequency). (Viewed differently, the frequency can bedetermined uniquely only if it is known to fall between a particularpair of adjacent peak and null, corresponding to a range that is onlyhalf the FSR.) To avoid this ambiguity (or increase the locking range ofthe filter to its full FSR) and achieve high locking sensitivity, it isdesirable to configure the wavelength locker such that the desiredlocking frequency (corresponding to the calibration frequency) falls ator near the filter mid-point. In practice, however, fabricationvariations cause the AMZI response to be frequency-shifted from deviceto device, such that the calibration frequency may be near themid-point, peak, or null of the filter response; the locking sensitivitythus varies between devices, and is unpredictable for any given device.While, in principle, the AMZI can be measured and correctedpost-fabrication (e.g. by focused laser annealing on the chip surface totrim each device to be within specifications), this approach is notwell-suited for high-volume production.

FIG. 2C is a schematic diagram of a wavelength locker including an AMZI200 and two detectors 208, 210 placed on the two opposite output portsof the AMZI 200 to create a “balanced receiver.” FIG. 2D is a graph ofthe frequency-dependent photocurrents 212, 213 measured at the twoindividual detectors 208, 210 as well as the balanced detector response214 resulting from the subtraction of one detector signal from the otherone. As can be seen, the balanced receiver captures all the transmittedpower, increasing the overall signal amplitude and, thus, the lockingsensitivity by a factor of two. However, the locking sensitivitydP_(det)/df still varies depending on the locking position, and is poorat the filter peak 215 or null 216. Assume, for example, that thelocking position is at 50 GHz in FIG. 2B and that only changes >10% ofthe full-scale voltage range can be measured for the signal to exceed a10% noise level. The frequency range corresponding to signalfluctuations below the noise floor will be ±3.6 GHz around the lockingposition (as shown analytically further below), allowing oscillation upto this magnitude to occur. By contrast, when the locking position is at25 GHz in FIG. 2D, the minimum measurable frequency shift will be ±0.8GHz, corresponding to a much higher locking accuracy. In addition tostill being subject to a high variability in the locking sensitivity,the balanced receiver does not resolve the ambiguity in determining thefilter phase and, thus, the frequency of the light source across a fullFSR.

Active Wavelength Locker Tuning

To overcome the variability of the locking sensitivity due tofabrication variations and facilitate unambiguous filter-phasedeterminations over about half a filter period, the AMZI may beprovided, in accordance with some embodiments, with an active tuningelement in one of the interferometer arms to adjust theoptical-path-length difference and thereby move the locking frequency toa high-sensitivity filter position post-fabrication. In FIG. 2E, theactive tuning element is symbolically shown as element 218. The activetuning element 218 may, for example, be a heater that can be used tochange the refractive index and/or the physical length (the formergenerally dominating) of a portion of one of the waveguides (as shown,the waveguide forming interferometer arm 202). Alternatively, the activetuning element 218 may utilize semiconductor materials to adjust therefractive index within a portion of the waveguide forminginterferometer arm 202, e.g., exploiting the linear or quadraticelectro-optic effect in compound semiconductors such as InP and GaAs, orfree carrier absorption in doped silicon or compound semiconductors.Calibrating the AMZI 200 involves using the active tuning element 218 toalign the maximum-slope position of the AMZI filter to the calibrationfrequency, and then holding the setting(s) of the active tuning element,such as, in the case of a heater, the heater power, constant. Thecalibrated setting(s) (e.g., heater power value) are saved as the targetsetting(s), and can be recalled when needed to maintain alignment of theAMZI 200. The stability of a wavelength locker with an integrated heateris strongly determined by the stability of the heater and its powersupply (and/or any ambient temperature sensor).

Coherent Receiver Configurations

In some embodiments, the severity of sensitivity variations withfabrication is significantly reduced, and an unambiguous determinationof the filter phase across the full filter period is facilitated,through use of a coherent receiver. In a coherent receiver, the outputcoupler 206 of the AMZI 200, which receives the two signals comingthrough the two interferometer arms 202, 204 as inputs and generatesmultiple respective optical interference signals as outputs, impartsadditional relative phase shifts Δφ_(i) (where i is an index runningthrough the number of interference signals) between the two interferingsignals (for total relative phase shifts of φ_(filter)+Δφ_(i)), andthese additional relative phase shifts Δφ_(i) differ between at leasttwo of the optical interference signals by a value that is not amultiple of 180°. In a 90-degree hybrid receiver, for example, fouroptical interference signals with additional relative phase shiftsΔφ_(i) (i=1, 2, 3, 4) between the interfering signals of 0°, 90°, 180°,and −90° are created. In a 120-degree hybrid receiver, three opticalinterference signals with additional relative phase shifts Δφ_(i) (i=1,2, 3) of 0°, 120°, and −120° are created. In general, from three opticalinterference signals with three different relative phase shifts (atleast two of which differ by a value that is not a multiple of 180°), orfrom two optical interference signals with different relative phaseshifts (differing by a value that is not a multiple of 180°) inconjunction with known amplitudes of the interfering signals, the filterphase and, thus, the frequency of the light source can be uniquelydetermined within a filter period (that is, up to multiples of 360° orthe FSR, respectively).

FIG. 3A illustrates, as an example of a coherent receiver in accordanceherewith, a 90-degree optical hybrid receiver with four detectors at theoutput of an AMZI 300. The 90-degree hybrid receiver can be implementedusing, as the output coupler 306 of the AMZI 300, e.g., a 4×4 multimodeinterference (MMI) coupler, a 2×4 MMI coupler followed by a 2×2 MMIcoupler, a star coupler, or three directional couplers (see, e.g.,Seok-Hwan Jeong et al., “Compact optical 90 hybrid employing a tapered2×4 MMI coupler serially connected by a 2×2 MMI coupler,” Opt. Express18[5], 4275-4288 (2010), which is hereby incorporated herein byreference). However implemented, the output coupler 306 provides fouroutput ports, whose respective signals are measured by the fourdetectors 308, 309, 310, 311. FIG. 3B shows the signals 312, 313, 314,315 measured by the detectors 308, 309, 310, 311, respectively. The fourdetectors 308, 309, 310, 311 form two balanced pairs of detectors. Onebalanced pair of detectors 308, 309 measures in-phase signals 312, 313resulting from additional relative phase shifts Δφ_(i) of 0° and 180°(up to multiples of 360°), providing a balanced in-phase photocurrentsignal (I):

$I_{I} = {\frac{1}{2}{R \cdot P_{i\; n} \cdot \cos}\;{\varphi_{filter}.}}$The other balanced pair of detectors 310, 311 measures quadraturesignals 314, 315 resulting from additional relative phase shifts Δφ_(i)of ±90° (up to multiples of 360°), providing a balanced quadraturephotocurrent signal (Q):

$I_{Q} = {\frac{1}{2}{R \cdot P_{i\; n} \cdot \sin}\;{\varphi_{filter}.}}$FIG. 3C illustrates the balanced I and Q responses 316, 317 for therespective detector pairs.

From the I and Q responses 316, 317, the filter phase φ_(filter) can bestraightforwardly extracted, e.g., using the two-argument arctangentfunction (which resolves the ambiguity of the arctangent function byconsidering the signs of the sine and cosine separately). FIG. 3D showsthe (phase-wrapped) filter phase φ_(filter) 318 calculated based on theI and Q responses. As can be seen, the phase 318 of the filter is linearfrom −180 to 180 degrees over the entire filter period (or FSR) of thefilter. Compared with the response 209 of a single detector as shown inFIG. 2B or the balanced detector response 214 shown in FIG. 2D, where aphase determination near the peak or null of the response is ambiguousas phases to either side of the phase or null result in the samephotocurrent, the filter phase 318 in FIG. 3D can be determined uniquelywithin the filter period (or FSR).

The I and Q responses 316, 317, which correspond to the real andimaginary components of the interference from the two AMZI paths, can becombined into a complex-valued signal with constant amplitude and afrequency-dependent phase (corresponding to the filter phase). Thesensitivity of this complex-valued signal to changes in frequency isgenerally lower than the sensitivity of a single balanced receiver atits best operating point, but exhibits lower frequency-dependency thanthe signal of a single balanced receiver, and may, in some embodiments,even become frequency-independent, depending on what the factorslimiting the sensitivity are (e.g., types of noise, which may or may notbe independent between the I and Q responses, or resolution of theanalog-to-digital conversion of the photocurrents). In general,sensitivities for the 90-degree hybrid differ between the best and worstlocking positions at most by a factor of only about 1.4, compared with afactor of about 44 for the balanced receiver at a 0.1% relative noiselevel, and a factor of about 140 at a 0.01% noise level—therefore thereis a greater benefit to using the 90-degree hybrid as the noise levelsare reduced. At a 0.01% relative noise level, the 90-degree hybridfrequency accuracy is more than 50 times (corresponding to more than 5bits) better than the balanced detector at their respective worstoperating points, while the accuracy of the balanced receiver is onlyabout twice as good as that of the 90-degree hybrid receiver at theirrespective best operating points. Thus, while the highest lockingsensitivity achieved with the 90-degree hybrid receiver is lower thanthat achieved with a balanced receiver, the worst performance is betterwith the 90-degree hybrid receiver. The wavelength locker with 90-degreehybrid receiver works similarly well at all locking positions.

The sensitivity, or accuracy, of a wavelength locker is determined bythe slope of the frequency-dependent transfer function I(P_(in)) (whichdepends on the receiver used) at a given filter position and the levelof noise in the detected signal. More specifically, the accuracy can bedetermined as the minimum frequency shift Δf that results in a change ΔIin the measured photocurrent just above the noise I_(noise), which ismodeled as the maximum noise level and is independent of signalamplitude:

${{\Delta\; I}} = {{{\frac{d\; I}{d\; f}\Delta\; f}} \cong {I_{noise}.}}$From

${\varphi_{filter} = {{\frac{2\;\pi}{FSR}f} = {A_{1}f}}},$where 2π/FSR ≡A₁ and FSR denotes the filter period of the AMZI, follows:

${{{\Delta\; I}} = {{{\frac{d\; I}{d\;\varphi_{filter}}A_{1}\Delta\; f}} \cong I_{noise}}},$or, inverted for Δf:

${{\Delta\; f}} \cong {\frac{I_{noise}}{{\frac{d\; I}{d\;\varphi_{filter}}}A_{1}}.}$

Evaluating this expression for the balanced receiver, whose transferfunction isI(P _(in))=R·P _(in)·cos φ_(filter) =R·P _(in)·cos(A ₁ f),we obtain, for values of f for which sin(A₁f)≠0:

${{\Delta\; f}} = {\frac{I_{noise}}{R \cdot P_{i\; n} \cdot A_{1} \cdot {{\sin\left( {A_{1}f} \right)}}}.}$For sin(A₁f)=0, the accuracy |Δf| can be approximated as the change|f−f₀| from A₁f₀=0 for which the corresponding change in photocurrent,|I−I₀| exceeds the noise:

$\begin{matrix}{{{\Delta\; I}} = {{{I - I_{0}}} = {{R \cdot {P_{i\; n}\left( {1 - {\cos\left( {A_{1}f} \right)}} \right)}} \cong I_{noise}}}} \\{{{\Delta\; f}} = {{{f - f_{0}}} = {f \cong {\frac{1}{A_{1}}{arc}\;{\cos\left( {1 - \frac{I_{noise}}{R \cdot P_{i\; n}}} \right)}}}}}\end{matrix}$

For the 90-degree optical hybrid receiver, the same analysis can beapplied to the in-phase and quadrature balanced outputs, each with halfthe peak photocurrent and the same noise as in the balancedphotodetector case (corresponding to an overall signal-to-noisedegradation by the square root of two). This is a worst-case estimate onaccuracy of the 90-degree hybrid, and assumes that the (e.g., thermal orcross-talk) noise is fixed per electrical trace. The transfer functionsfor the two balanced outputs are:

$\begin{matrix}{{I_{I}\left( P_{i\; n} \right)} = {{\frac{1}{2}{R \cdot P_{i\; n} \cdot \cos}\;\varphi_{filter}} = {\frac{1}{2}{R \cdot P_{i\; n} \cdot {\cos\left( {A_{1}f} \right)}}}}} \\{{I_{Q}\left( P_{i\; n} \right)} = {{\frac{1}{2}{R \cdot P_{i\; n} \cdot \sin}\;\varphi_{filter}} = {\frac{1}{2}{R \cdot P_{i\; n} \cdot {\sin\left( {A_{1}f} \right)}}}}}\end{matrix}$For A₁f=0, the accuracy is limited by the quadrature output accuracy,

${{{\Delta\; f_{Q}}} = \frac{I_{noise}}{R \cdot \frac{P_{i\; n}}{2} \cdot A_{1} \cdot {{\cos\left( {A_{1}f} \right)}}}},$and for A₁f=π/2, the accuracy is limited by the in-phase outputaccuracy,

${{\Delta\; f_{I}}} = \frac{I_{noise}}{R \cdot \frac{P_{i\; n}}{2} \cdot A_{1} \cdot {{\sin\left( {A_{1}f} \right)}}}$

Assuming that the two balanced receiver lines each can have the samemaximum noise magnitude, the total maximum noise can be calculated bycombining in quadrature:

$\begin{matrix}{{{\Delta\; f}} = {- \frac{\sqrt{2} \cdot I_{noise}}{R \cdot \frac{P_{i\; n}}{2} \cdot A_{1} \cdot \left( {{{\cos\left( {A_{1}f} \right)}} + {{\sin\left( {A_{1}f} \right)}}} \right)}}} \\{= {\frac{I_{noise}}{R \cdot P_{i\; n}} \cdot \frac{\sqrt{2} \cdot {{FSR}/\pi}}{\left( {{{\cos\left( {A_{1}f} \right)}} + {{\sin\left( {A_{1}f} \right)}}} \right)}}}\end{matrix}$This analysis is also useful for calculating the frequency uncertaintydue to quantization error in analog-to-digital conversion of the signal.For quantization error, the two balanced receiver lines will each havethe same current resolution and maximum error due to quantization. Thetotal frequency uncertainty due to quantization error will be at aminimum for relative phases of the two AMZI waveguide modes of 0, 90,180, or 270 degrees, where all of the error is due to one of the twobalanced detector channels. The total quantization error will be largerby a factor of √{square root over (2)} for relative phases of the twoAMZI waveguide modes of 45, 135, 225, or 315 degrees, where both of thebalanced detector channels contribute equally to the error.

There are other situations in which the frequency uncertainty of acoherent receiver may be nearly independent of the phase of the two AMZIwaveguide modes. This can occur if the noise sources on the two balancedchannels each have identical Gaussian distributions, where the noisesources are uncorrelated. This model is appropriate if the noise is duesolely to Johnson-Nyquist noise of the detection and amplificationcircuits. The key difference in this model that results in phaseindependence is that the modeling of noise with a probabilitydistribution instead of a maximum noise per channel avoids a penalty at45+90·n degrees, where both balanced detector channels contributeequally to the signal, because their probability distributions arecombined orthogonally. Therefore, at a given point in time, theprobability that both balanced detector channels introduce anabove-average level of noise error is lower than the probability thatthe first of the two balanced detector channels introduces anabove-average level of noise error.

From the above expressions for the balanced receiver and the 90-degreehybrid receiver, the receiver accuracies can be computed for a givenoperating point and relative noise level I_(noise)/(R·P_(in)). To reducethe noise level, the AMZI or light source may have a frequency ditherapplied to reduce direct-current (DC) noise, and the signal may then bemeasured at an integer multiple of the dither frequency. However,regardless of the overall noise level in the system, the relativeaccuracies between different receiver configurations remain the same.The following table compares the best-case and worst-case receiveraccuracies of the balanced receiver and 90-degree hybrid receiver withfixed noise at three relative noise levels. (For the balanced receiver,the worst operating point is at the position where the filter responsehas the lowest slope, that is, at the peak or null, and the bestoperating point is at the position where the filter response has thehighest slope, that is, the filter mid-point. For the 90-degree hybrid,the worst operating point is at points where the in-phase and quadraturesignal are equal in amplitude.) The case of a 90-degree hybrid receiverwith uncorrelated Gaussian noise in the balanced detector channels isalso included. For the latter case, the noise level can be independentof phase. Since it is a probabilistic distribution, the noise can bedescribed probabilistically. For example, in the table, the 3σ noiselevel refers to a level of noise that will not be exceeded for 99.7% ofmeasurements.

90-degree hybrid receiver with uncorrelated Gaussian noise in the90-degree hybrid balanced detector receiver with fixed noise channels ineach balanced detector Worst Best Balanced receiver channel operatingoperating Relative noise Worst Best Worst Best point, 3σ point, 3σ leveloperating operating operating operating noise noise l_(noise)/(R ·P_(in)) point point point point level level 01% 0.23% of 0.0016% 0.0045%0.0032% 0.0032% 0.0032% [40 dB SNR] FSR of FSR of FSR of FSR of FSR ofFSR 0.1%  0.72% of  0.016%  0.045%  0.032%  0.032%  0.032% [30 dB SNR]FSR of FSR of FSR of FSR of FSR of FSR  1%  2.3% of  0.16%  0.45%  0.32%  0.32%  0.32% [20 dB SNR] FSR of FSR of FSR of FSR of FSR of FSR10%  7.2% of   1.6%   4.5%   3.2%   3.2%   3.2% [10 dB SNR] FSR of FSRof FSR of FSR of FSR of FSR

As a comparison of the results for the balanced receiver and the90-degree hybrid receiver reveals, the accuracy of the 90-degree opticalhybrid receiver is lower than that of the balanced receiver at theoptimal operating point, but higher than that of the balanced receiverat the worst operating point. When the position of the filter isunknown, e.g., due to fabrication variations and lack ofpost-fabrication tuning, the system is generally designed for theworst-case operating condition; accordingly, the 90-degree hybridconfiguration is generally preferable. In addition to providing a betterperformance in the worst-case scenario, the 90-degree hybrid receiverconfiguration results in lower variability of the accuracy, improvingthe predictability of wavelength locking performance. For a 120-degreehybrid receiver, the accuracy is similar to that of the 90-degree hybridreceiver. To compute the accuracy of the 120-degree hybrid receiver, thereceived power is computationally separated into orthogonal components,and then the above formulism for the 90-degree hybrid is followed. Forother non-standard multiphase receivers with the incoming powernonuniformly distributed between the in-phase and quadrature orthogonalstates, the amount of power received in each state can be used tocalculate the best and worst operating points.

Beneficially, a wavelength locker with a coherent receiver allows thestability of a passive optical cavity to be achieved, and since apassive optical cavity dissipates no power, its stability can besignificantly better than that of active tuning elements. Additionalbenefits of the coherent receiver include reduced power consumptionsince no tuning element is required; reduced thermal gradients thatcould impact stability or reliability on the PIC since heaters for phasetuning are avoided; and simplified feedback loop and controls as thelaser (or other light source) directly locks to the AMZI, withoutadditional tuning and stabilization circuits.

Staged Filter Configuration

The wavelength accuracy of wavelength lockers in accordance herewith is,as shown above, proportional to the filter period (or FSR) of the AMZI.A narrower period (e.g., 100 GHz, as shown in FIGS. 2B, 2D, and 3B-3D)provides greater wavelength accuracy than a wider period (e.g., 2 THz).It is common that the wavelength of the light source can tune beyond thelimits of a single narrow AMZI period, introducing an ambiguity in thefrequency. A single AMZI allows the frequency of the light source to bedetermined only up to multiples of its FSR. In order to resolve thisambiguity while still achieving the higher wavelength accuracy affordedby a narrow-period filter, a secondary, coarser filter may be used, inaccordance with some embodiments, to locate a single period of the finefilter. Such a two-stage filter is shown in FIGS. 4A and 4B. Withreference to FIG. 4A, the input signal is split between two AMZIs 400,402, each of which is equipped with a 90-degree hybrid receiver inaccordance with the embodiment of FIGS. 3A-3D. One AMZI 400 has a largeFSR (e.g., 2 THz) and acts as a coarse filter to determine the frequencyof the light source with sufficient accuracy to locate it within aspecific one of the filter periods of the other AMZI 402. That otherAMZI 402 has a small FSR (e.g., 100 GHz) and acts as a fine filter todetermine the frequency of the light source within the determined filterperiod. As will be appreciated, this two-stage wavelength lockerconfiguration is generally applicable to any AMZIs, and does not requirethe use of 90-degree hybrid receivers (although they are beneficial).For example, as shown in FIG. 4B, AMZIs 404, 406 with active tuningelements may be used to achieve optimal locking positions within eachAMZI 404, 406.

It will further be appreciated that three or more AMZIs with differentrespective FSRs may be used to accommodate even larger tuning ranges ofthe light source and/or allow for increased wavelength accuracy throughthe use of a narrower-period AMZI in the finest filter stage. Inoperation, the wavelength of the light source is known to be within theoverall operating range of the coarse filter, or is placed within thatrange using additional sensors such as a temperature reading orphotocurrent from another component. Information from the coarse filtertransmission is then used to align the laser within a single period ofthe next-finer filter, and so forth until a single period of the finestfilter can be located. The factor by which the addition of a filterstage can increase the overall frequency range covered by themulti-stage wavelength locker is the ratio between the range covered bythe added filter stage to its frequency accuracy. In variousembodiments, a single filter stage can cover a frequency range that isat least five times, and may even reach one hundred times, its frequencyaccuracy, with an accuracy of less than 1 GHz being achievable whenstrain and temperature sensors are used. Thus, a single filter stagemay, for example, achieve locking accuracies of 50 GHz or lesssimultaneously with locking ranges in excess of 250 GHz or even 5 THz insome embodiments. Using multi-stage wavelength-locker configurations,locking accuracies of 50 GHz may be achieved simultaneously with lockingranges in excess of 8 THz, which corresponds to a 60 nm laser tuningrange in the C band and will be sufficient for a large number ofapplications. With each filter stage added, the range requirements foreach individual stage can be relaxed.

Temperature and Strain Compensation

The optical response of an AMZI generally shifts in frequency inresponse to temperature changes that cause thermal expansion or changesin the thermo-optic coefficient, or as a result of strain-inducedchanges in the path-length difference between the interferometer arms.Consequently, in the presence of temperature changes or mechanicalstrain, the wavelength accuracy of the AMZI, used as a wavelengthreference in accordance herewith, is diminished unless the temperatureand/or strain are accounted for.

Temperature-related shifts in the AMZI response can be significantlyreduced with an athermal AMZI, as is known in the art and may beemployed in embodiments of the disclosed subject matter. To render anAMZI athermal, waveguide portions with complementary thermal propertiescan be exploited to configure the waveguide arms such that thetemperature-induced optical-path-length change in each arm, or at leastthe difference between any temperature-induced optical-path lengthchanges in the two arms, is minimal over the operating temperaturerange. The complementary thermal properties may be achieved through theuse of different waveguide materials and/or different waveguide widths.For instance, in some embodiments, a single material such as silicon(Si), silicon oxide (SiO₂), GaAs, or InP is used in conjunction with twowaveguide widths; in other embodiments, two different materials, such assilicon and silicon nitride (SiNx), or silicon and silicon oxide, areused for the two waveguides; and in still further embodiments, a singlewaveguide material and width are combined with two different claddingmaterials (e.g., spin-on polymers) for the two waveguides.

In one particular embodiment, a first material (e.g., silicon) having adispersion dβ₁/dT is used for an extra length Δl in one waveguide, and asecond material (e.g., SiNx) with different dispersion dβ₂/dT is usedfor an extra length Δl+ΔL of the other waveguide; herein, β_(i)=2πn_(l)λ (i=1,2) is the wavenumber, with n _(l), being the refractive indexof the respective material, and the dispersion is the change in thewavenumber with a change in temperature T. The lengths Δl and ΔL arechosen, dependent on the two materials, such that, as the AMZIexperiences a temperature change relative to a given wavelength-specifictemperature, herein the “nominal athermal temperature,” the resultingchange in the optical path lengths is substantially the same for bothinterferometer arms, such that the difference in optical path lengthsbetween the arms stays substantially fixed (i.e., varies by a smallamount for small temperature changes around the nominal athermaltemperature). Consequently, the filter phase φ=[β₁ΔL+Δl(β₁−β₂)] remainsunaffected by the change in temperature.

Results for a fabricated athermal AMZI using Si and SiNx waveguides areshown in FIGS. 5A and 5B. In FIG. 5A, the transmission null of theathermal AMZI (corresponding to destructive interference at the output)is illustrated for 30° C. (solid line 500), 53° C. (bold dashed line502), and 85° C. (fine dashed line 504), respectively. As can be seen,temperature variations of this magnitude cause shifts in the peakwavelength λ_(peak) (corresponding to peaks 506, 508, 510, respectively)on the order of 0.1 nm. FIG. 5B shows the wavelength dependence of theremaining athermality dλ_(peak)/dT 512 at 53° C. over a wavelength rangefrom 1270 to 1320 nm; the athermality is on the order of −1 pm/° C.across that range.

An athermal AMZI is completely athermal (in the sense that the variationof the filter peak-transmission wavelength or frequency withtemperature, dλ_(peak)/dT or df_(peak)/dT, equals zero) only at thenominal athermal temperature for a given peak wavelength. Away from thenominal athermal temperature, a slight error grows. This is illustratedin FIG. 6, which shows lines of constant levels of athermality (lines600, 602, 604, 606, 608, 610, 612) within a two-dimensional spacespanning a range of wavelengths and temperatures. The error may beinsignificant for coarse applications, but it can have a practicallysignificant effect when the required frequency accuracy of thewavelength locker is ≤50 GHz.

In accordance with various embodiments, therefore, the error iscompensated for by measuring the temperature of the AMZI with anintegrated temperature sensor placed in the vicinity of the AMZI (e.g.,sensor 118 in FIG. 1), and computationally correcting the stored targetfilter phase (or other target filter parameters) for the AMZI, whichcorresponds to the desired locking frequency, based on the measuredtemperature. For this purpose, the AMZI filter response is measured(prior to device deployment) at multiple wavelengths and temperatures.The computational correction may be implemented with processing logic(e.g., provided as part of electronic processing circuitry 106)configured to calculate correction coefficients or adjustments to storedtarget parameters/settings once the temperature and, in some instances,photocurrents have been measured, e.g., using a stored functionaldependence of the correction coefficient and/or targetparameters/settings on the temperature. Alternatively, a pre-computedlook-up table of correction coefficients and/or corrected targetparameter values or settings may be stored (e.g., in memory 108), andthe electronic processing circuitry may be configured to select one ofthe stored correction coefficients and/or target parameter values orsettings based on the measured temperature and strain. Combinations ofreal-time computation and precomputation may also be used. Theprocessing logic and/or look-up table may be provided on-chip (or atleast in the same multi-chip module) or in an external device accessibleby the wavelength locker.

Comparison of the filter phase computed from the detector signals withthe adjusted target filter phase (or, alternatively, comparison of themeasured filter phase, adjusted based on the temperature, with the(original) target filter phase) can be used as feedback to tune thelaser (or other light source) to the desired locking frequency. For anerror of ΔT_(sensor) of the integrated temperature sensor, the error ofthe temperature-induced shift in peak wavelength isdλ_(peak)/dT·ΔT_(sensor). Since dλ_(peak)/dT is small, the temperaturereading does not need to be highly accurate to provide a significantcorrection to the athermal AMZI. For example, a 5° C. error on a 50° C.temperature change still corrects ˜90% of the temperature-induced erroron the athermal AMZI. Additionally, a 5° C. error on a 0° C. temperaturechange causes less than a 1 GHz error due to the high athermality of theAMZI. A temperature sensor, thus, provides an enhancement to theathermal AMZI, and the relative error of the wavelength locker is betterthan that of the temperature sensor.

Similarly to temperature effects, strain-induced variations of the AMZIresponse can be accounted for, in accordance with various embodiments,by computational corrections based on strain measurements. Straineffects can change the path length of an AMZI, thereby shifting itsfrequency-dependent response. During calibration, the integratedwavelength locker is mapped to an external wavelength reference, and anystrain changes that occurred prior to calibration are inherentlyaccounted for. However, strain changes after calibration due tohandling, mounting, installation, and aging of the wavelength lockerwill impact the filter position. To measure strain, an integrated straingauge may be made using two resistance temperature detectors (RTDs) withdifferent metals. One metal has a high temperature coefficient ofresistance (TCR), whereas the other has a low TCR; for example, thehigher TCR may be greater than 1000 ppm/C° and the lower TCR may besmaller than 100 ppm/C°. It is, furthermore, beneficial to have a lowgauge factor (GF, defined as the ratio of the relative change inelectrical resistance to applied strain) on the high-TCR metal, and alow coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) on the low-TCR metal tominimize strain measurement errors. In some embodiments, the GF of thehigh-TCR metal is smaller than 6, and the CTE of the low-TCR metal issmaller than 100 ppm/° C. Suitable metals for the two RTDs are, forinstance, platinum (Pt) for the high-TCR metal and nickel chromium(NiCr) for the low-TCR metal. While NiCr is the most common integratedlow-TCR metal, additional suitable metals and alloys include nickelchromium silicon (NiCrSi), tantalum nitride (TaN), and chromium silicontantalum aluminum (CrSiTaAl). Common integrated high-TCR metals includealuminum (Al), nickel (Ni), and tungsten (W), while gold (Au), silver(Ag), and copper (Cu) are less commonly used. The resistance changesundergone by RTDs made from these two metals with changes in temperatureand strain (ΔT and Δ∈, respectively) are:R _(Pt RTD) =R _(0,Pt RTD)(1+TCR _(Pt) ·ΔT+GF _(Pt) ·Δ∈+ΔCTE _(Pt)·ΔT·GF _(Pt))R _(NiCr RTD) =R _(0,NiCr RTD)(1+TCR _(NiCr) ·ΔT+GF _(NiCr) ·Δ∈+ΔCTE_(NiCr) ·ΔT·GF _(NiCr))Herein, R_(0,Pt RTD) and R_(0,NiCr RTD) are the reference resistances.From a given set of resistance measurements on two RTDs, the strain andtemperature changes can be extracted according to:

$\begin{matrix}{{\Delta\epsilon} = \frac{\begin{matrix}\left( {\frac{R_{{NiCr}\;{RTD}}}{R_{0,{{NiCr}\;{RTD}}}} - 1 - {\frac{{TCR}_{NiCr} + {\Delta\;{{CTE}_{NiCr} \cdot {GF}_{NiCr}}}}{{TCR}_{Pt} + {\Delta\;{{CTE}_{Pt} \cdot {GF}_{Pt}}}} \cdot \frac{R_{{Pt}\;{RTD}}}{R_{0,{{Pt}\;{RTD}}}}} +} \right. \\\left. \frac{{TCR}_{NiCr} + {\Delta\;{{CTE}_{NiCr} \cdot {GF}_{NiCr}}}}{{TCR}_{Pt} + {\Delta\;{{CTE}_{Pt} \cdot {GF}_{P\; t}}}} \right)\end{matrix}}{{GF}_{NiCr} - {{GF}_{Pt}\frac{{TCR}_{NiCr} + {\Delta\;{{CTE}_{NiCr} \cdot {GF}_{NiCr}}}}{{TCR}_{Pt} + {\Delta\;{{CTE}_{Pt} \cdot {GF}_{P\; t}}}}}}} \\{{\Delta\; T} = {\frac{{{GF}_{NiCr}\left( {\frac{R_{{Pt}\;{RTD}}}{R_{0,{{Pt}\;{RTD}}}} - 1} \right)} - {{GF}_{Pt}\left( {\frac{R_{{NiCr}\;{RTD}}}{R_{0,{NiCrRTD}}} - 1} \right)}}{\begin{matrix}{{{GF}_{NiCr}\left( {{TCR}_{Pt} + {\Delta\;{{CTE}_{Pt} \cdot {GF}_{P\; t}}}} \right)} - {{GF}_{Pt}\left( {{{TCR}_{NiCr}{TCR}_{NiCr}} +} \right.}} \\\left. {\Delta\;{{CTE}_{NiCr} \cdot {GF}_{NiCr}}} \right)\end{matrix}}.}}\end{matrix}$Based on the measured strain, the target filter phase (or other targetfilter parameters) can be computationally corrected prior to comparisonwith the measured filter phase. As with corrections for temperaturechanges, strain-based computational corrections may be implemented withprocessing logic and/or a pre-computed look-up table of correctioncoefficients or strain-dependent target parameters/settings.

Combining corrections for temperature and isotropic strain changes, acorrection Δφ for the AMZI target filter phase can be calculated using:Δφ(ΔT,Δ∈)=[β₁ ΔL+Δl(β₁−β₂)]·(1+Δ∈),where β₁ and β₂ are functions of temperature. For anisotropic strainthat is different between the X and Y directions, the correction isbased on two values Δ∈_(x) and Δ∈_(y) measured with two respectivestrain gauges, each aligned with the respective axis. In embodimentswhere strain- and temperature-based adjustments are pre-computed, thelook-up table may include separate sets of correction coefficients fortemperature-based and strain-based adjustments, or store adjust targetparameters or settings for a range of combinations of temperature andstrain values. Tuning the light source to a target filter phase adjustedbased on the measured temperature and strain is akin to reading off theaccrued error at a given temperature and wavelength (e.g., using therelation depicted in FIG. 6) or a given strain and wavelength, andadjusting the frequency position of the laser by that error.

As will be appreciated, temperature- and strain compensation asdescribed above are generally applicable to any AMZI-based wavelengthlockers, including, but not limited to, wavelength lockers with90-degree hybrid receivers or active tuning elements as disclosedherein.

Wavelength Locker Calibration and Operation

With reference to FIGS. 7A-8B, example methods of calibrating andoperating integrated wavelength lockers in accordance with variousembodiments will now be described. FIG. 7A illustrates an examplecalibration method 700 for a wavelength locker including a coherent(e.g., 90-degree hybrid) receiver. Once the PIC laser is turned on (act702), and, optionally, after a unique frequency dither has been appliedfor AC detection, which may serve to decrease the noise level (act 704),the optical signal of the PIC laser is captured in a calibration system(act 706), such as an external (i.e., off-chip) wavelength filter orwavelength measurement system, which may include a reference laser,providing a calibration wavelength that corresponds to the desiredlocking wavelength. A power splitter may, for example, route a knownfraction of the laser output off-chip, while the remainder of the laseroutput is coupled into the on-chip wavelength locker. The PIC laserwavelength is compared with the calibration wavelength (act 708), andthen tuned until a match with the calibration wavelength has beenachieved (act 710). In this state, the photocurrents on all detectors ofthe coherent receiver (or the multiple coherent receivers in multi-stagewavelength lockers) are measured (act 712) and computationally convertedto a filter phase (or multiple filter phases for multiple respectivestages) (act 714). The filter phase(s) are stored in (e.g., on-chip)memory associated with the wavelength locker (act 716). Alternatively tousing the PIC laser itself, the wavelength locker may be calibratedusing an external reference laser emitting light at the desired lockingwavelength.

FIG. 7B illustrates a method 750 for using a wavelength locker with acoherent receiver, calibrated in accordance with the method 700 of FIG.7A, for wavelength stabilization. Once the PIC laser is turned on (act752) and, optionally, a frequency dither has been applied (act 754), thephotocurrents on all detectors of the coherent receiver are measured(act 756) and computationally converted to a filter phase (hereinafterthe “measured filter phase,” to distinguish from the target filterphase) (act 758). Optionally, the temperature and/or strain in the AMZIare measured and used to adjust either the measured filter phase or thestored target filter phase (act 760). Following any such adjustment, themeasured filter phase is compared with the target filter phase (act762), and the PIC laser is tuned until the measured filter phase matchesthe target filter phase (act 764). In embodiments with multiple filterstages, the process is repeated for each stage, going from coarser tofiner filters. To keep the laser wavelength locked over an extendedperiod of time, measurements of the filter phase (acts 756, 758) andlaser tuning based on comparison against the target filter phase(following temperature- or strain-based adjustments, if applicable)(acts 760, 762, 764) may be repeated continuously or at regular orotherwise specified time intervals. As will be appreciated, the variousacts of the method 750 need not all be performed in the exact orderdepicted. For example, measurements of the temperature and/or strain inthe AMZI and target-phase adjustments based thereon may precededetermination of the measured filter phase. Further, to the extent thetemperature and strain can be assumed to be constant during a period ofoperation, their measurement and the target-phase adjustments need notbe repeated during each iteration.

FIG. 8A illustrates an example calibration method 800 for an integratedwavelength locker with an active tuning element. Once the PIC laser isturned on (act 702), and, optionally, after a unique frequency ditherhas been applied for AC detection (act 704), the optical signal of thePIC laser is captured in a calibration system (act 706) and compared inwavelength against a calibration wavelength (act 708), and the PIC laseris tuned until its wavelength matches the calibration wavelength (act710), in the same manner as in method 700 (FIG. 7A) for wavelengthlockers with coherent receivers. Further, the photocurrents on thedetectors of the balanced receiver are measured (act 812). Instead ofconverting the measured photocurrents to a filter phase, however, theyare used to tune the heater (or other active tuning element) in the AMZIuntil the corresponding balanced detector signal is zero (act 812),which occurs at the maximum slope, i.e., point of highest sensitivity,of the filter. The heater power value and any other tuned heatersettings are stored as target settings in memory (act 814). Inmulti-stage wavelength lockers, the heater settings of heaters in allAMZIs can be adjusted, e.g., going from coarsest to finest filter, toachieve zero balanced photocurrents on all stages. The multiple stagescan be tuned nearly independently from one another, where a small amountof thermal cross-talk may cause some very minor interaction between thestages. If cross-talk effects have a significant effect on the accuracydue to proximity of the multiple stages, the calibration process can berepeated after the first iteration to compensate for these thermaleffects. In each iteration, the thermal adjustments become smaller andthe cross-talk eventually becomes negligible. Alternatively, each stagecan be operated with independent close-loop feedback to converge allstages to zero balanced photocurrent at the same time.

FIG. 8B illustrates a method 850 for using a wavelength locker with anactive tuning element, calibrated in accordance with the method of FIG.8A, for wavelength stabilization. The PIC laser is turned on (act 752),a frequency dither is optionally applied (act 754), and then the heaterin the AMZI is set to the power value or other target settings stored inmemory (act 854), following optional adjustment of the target settingsbased on measurements of the temperature and/or strain of the AMZI (act852). The temperature sensor is placed sufficiently far from the heaterthat the thermal cross-talk between the two is minimal and hence thetemperature sensor records the ambient temperature of the PIC and notthe heater; in certain embodiments, this can be achieved by placing thetemperature sensor near the opposite AMZI arm as the heater. Thephotocurrents on the detectors of the balanced receiver are thenmeasured (act 856) and provided as feedback to tune the PIC laser untilthe balanced photocurrent is zero (act 858). In embodiments withmultiple filter stages, the stages are tuned sequentially, from coarsestto finest filter, by measuring the temperature and/or strain in therespective AMZI (if applicable), adjusting the respective heater to itsstored target settings, and tuning the laser until the balancedphotocurrent measured with the respective receiver is zero (acts852-858). When tuning the laser, the heater(s) of any coarser stage(s)may be left turned on during optimization of the finer stage(s).Alternatively, it is possible to tune a filter stage having only theheater of that stage turned on, which reduces power consumption andavoids cross talk. Photocurrent measurements and laser tuning maycontinue (acts 856, 858), or be repeated at specified intervals, tomaintain the locking position. Depending on the stability of temperatureand strain, their measurement and adjustment based thereon (acts 852,854) may be, but need not be, repeated during each iteration.

Summarizing the above-described methods, wavelength locking inaccordance herewith generally involves measuring photocurrents with thedetectors of the wavelength locker, and, using the electronic processingcircuitry, tuning the frequency of the light coupled into the AMZI tosatisfy a certain locking condition. The locking condition may varydepending on the type of wavelength locker. In wavelength lockerswithout an active tuning element in the AMZI, the locking condition mayinvolve a match between a filter phase or other filter parameter derivedfrom the measured photocurrents and a target filter phase or othertarget filter parameter, respectively, as stored during calibration. Inwavelength lockers with an active tuning element, such as a heater, inthe AMZI, the locking condition may be that, when the active tuningelement is tuned to stored target settings (e.g., a target heaterpower), the measured photocurrents assume specified values, e.g.,balanced photocurrents are substantially (i.e., within the margins oferror associated with the measurement) zero. In either case, a feedbackparameter derived from the measured optical interference signals—e.g., afilter phase computed from the optical interference signals, or thebalanced photocurrent itself—is used to tune the laser until the lockingcondition is satisfied. In some embodiments, a parameter of the lockingcondition, such as a target parameter or target setting, is adjustedbased on a measured temperature and/or strain in the AMZI.

PIC Manufacturing and Packaging

Wavelength lockers as described above can be manufactured along with thelight source to be wavelength-locked on a single PIC chip using asuitable sequence of etch and deposition steps. The memory storing thetarget filter phase(s) and/or target setting(s) and the electroniccircuitry used to process the optical interference signals to tune theon-chip light source based on the stored target filter phase(s) orsetting(s) and the measurements may be implemented on a separateelectronic control chip (or multiple chips), and both the PIC chip andthe electronic control chip(s) may be bonded (e.g., bump-bonded orwire-bonded) or otherwise attached to a unifying substrate to form amulti-chip module or “package.” Alternatively, the memory and electroniccircuitry may be implemented on the PIC chip itself, or verticallyintegrated with the PIC chip. It is also possible to provide the memoryand/or electronic circuitry in a separate device electrically connectedto the PIC, e.g., a general-purpose computer with a hardware processorand associated memory that executes suitable software to provide thesignal-processing functionality. Further, processing functionality andstored data may be split between on-chip and off-chip circuitry andmemory.

FIG. 9 illustrates, in the form of a flow chart, an example method 900of manufacturing and assembling a multi-chip integrated wavelengthlocker module in accordance with various embodiments. Various steps ofthe method 900 are further illustrated in FIGS. 10A-10D. The method 900begins, in act 902, with the creation of a PIC including a tunable lightsource and the optical components of an integrated wavelength locker ona semiconductor substrate, such as, e.g., a silicon-on-insulator (SOI)substrate or a compound semiconductor substrate. The details of PICcreation and the resulting PIC structure generally vary depending on thetype of substrate. In general, the process may involve a series oflithographic (e.g., photolithographic) patterning, etching, anddeposition (including, e.g., epitaxial growth) steps.

With reference to FIG. 10A, implementation of a PIC 1000 on an SOIsubstrate 1002 (which includes layers of silicon, silicon oxide, andsilicon) is shown in cross-sectional view. The top silicon layer 1004 ofthe SOI substrate 1002 is patterned and then partially etched to formthe waveguides and other integrated optical structures 1006 of the AMZI(including the output coupler) in region 1007 and of a laser diode andassociated modulator (used to send data and optionally apply a lowfrequency dither signal to the laser) and photodiodes (serving as thedetectors) in region 1008. The laser can be tuned using semiconductormaterial in region 1008 to exploit linear and/or quadratic electro-opticeffects or carrier injection (via free carrier absorption, bandgapshrinkage, band filling effects), or by a thermal tuning element inregion 1007 placed within the laser cavity. The output coupler may be,for example, an MMI that takes the form of a rectangle (in top view,e.g., as shown in FIG. 3A) that merges into the (narrower, andoptionally tapered) waveguides at the input and output ports. Thedimensions of the rectangular MMI and the positions of the inputs andoutputs are chosen such that specified phase shifts are imparted betweenthe two waves originating at the input ports and interfering at one ofthe outputs; these phase shifts generally differ between the outputports. For a 90-degree hybrid receiver, for example, the output couplermay be configured such that the phase shifts between the two interferingsignals are 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° at the four output ports,respectively. (The same filter-phase information can be obtained if thefour relative phase shifts are all shifted by the same additional phaseoffset.) On top of the patterned and etched silicon layer, an insulatinglayer of silicon-oxide may be deposited to form a cladding 1010. In theregion 1008 of the laser and detectors, on top of the cladding 1010above the integrated optical structures of these components, compoundsemiconductor material 1012 including n-doped and p-doped regions isdeposited to form the laser diodes, modulators, and photodiodes;typically, the compound semiconductor includes multiple differentmaterials bonded to the surface and optimized for each function. Padmetal and metal contacts (not shown) are deposited to facilitateapplying a current through the laser diode to cause stimulated emission,applying a current or voltage to laser tuning elements, generating avariable electric field across the modulator to transmit data andoptionally provide dither for the wavelength locker, and measuringcurrents generated in the photodiodes. Light created in the laser diodeis coupled into the integrated optical structures beneath, which mayform a resonant cavity with an output coupler leading to the modulator,optional optical switches and power dividers, and then the input of theAMZI. Light from the output ports of the output coupler of thewavelength locker is coupled into the compound semiconductor of thephotodiodes.

FIG. 10B illustrates, likewise in cross-sectional view, an alternativeimplementation of a PIC 1020 on a compound semiconductor substrate 1022,such as, e.g., InP or GaAs. The PIC 1020 includes, deposited on thesubstrate 1022, a variety of active regions of a first type(collectively first region 1024) that are used for the laser diode, themodulator, and the photodiodes (where different types of materials ofthe first type may be used for the different respective components), anda region of a second type (indicated as second region 1026) that is usedfor the AMZI (including the output coupler) of the wavelength locker.The regions of the first type are doped compound semiconductors. Theregion(s) of the second type (used for tuning the AMZI) are either dopedcompound semiconductor or un-doped compound semiconductor with a thermaltuner deposited on the surface. To create this PIC 1020, compoundsemiconductor material of the first type is epitaxially grown over thewhole surface of the substrate 1022. A suitable masking material, suchas an oxide or nitride, is then deposited over the surface andlithographically protected in the first region 1024. In the secondregion 1026, the masking material and the semiconductor material of thefirst type are etched away to expose the bare substrate 1022 or asuitable growth buffer layer. Thereafter, compound semiconductormaterial of the second type is epitaxially grown in the exposed secondregion 1026. The masking material covering the first region 1024, andany material of the second type deposited thereon, may then be removed.To create multiple regions of the first type (as sub-regions of thefirst region 1024), the process of epitaxially growing material over theentire surface, masking it where desired, and etching it away in theremaining regions (e.g., the second region) may be repeated, prior orsubsequently to depositing the material of the second type, as needed.Further, each region (or sub-region) of the first or second type may belithographically patterned and etched when exposed. For example, ridgewaveguides and wave-confining structures 1028 of the laser, detectors,and wavelength locker are lithographically defined and etched in thesecond region 1026. Finally, a cladding layer 1030 (e.g., siliconnitride or silicon oxide) is disposed above the surface, and pad metaland metal contacts are defined and deposited (the exact order of stepsvarying depending on the particular manufacturing process). In thisembodiment, light is generated, modulated, routed, and detected in theintegrated optical structures 1028 formed.

Returning to the description of FIG. 9, in embodiments that include aheater, temperature sensor, and/or strain gauge in the AMZI, a series ofadditional metal deposition steps follow the creation of the integratedoptical structures of the wavelength locker (904). With reference toFIG. 10C (which shows the SOI implementation of PIC 1000), to create aheater 1050 for thermally tuning the AMZI, a metal with a high meltingpoint, such as, e.g., tungsten (W), is deposited above one of thewaveguide arms of the MZI, e.g., in the form of a continuous patch orwinding trace. To monitor the temperature and/or strain in the AMZI,metals for a temperature sensor 1052 and strain gauge 1054 are depositedin the vicinity of the AMZI. For the temperature sensor 1052, a metalwith a high TCR (e.g., exceeding 1000 ppm/° C.), such as, e.g.,platinum, is used, and for the strain gauge 1054, a second metal with alow-TCR (e.g., below 100 ppm/°), such as, e.g., nickel chromium, isadded. The metal deposits for the heater 1050, temperature sensor 1052,and/or strain gauge 1054 are encapsulated in a dielectric 1056. Allelectrical components are connected to thick metal traces (e.g., made ofgold or silver) through vias in the encapsulation dielectric. Thesethick metal traces allow connection of the integrated components toexternal electronics such as probe cards and wirebonds. In someembodiments, copper micropillars or posts are added on the surface ofthe PIC 1000 and attached to the thick metal traces. These coppermicropillars extend between 10 μm and 100 μm from the surface of the PIC1000; they have solder deposited on their top surface, and they haveadditional dielectric or polymer encapsulation around their base at themetal trace interface. The micropillars may be connected to electricalpads on organic substrates, which can then be attached to a printedcircuit board (PCB) through ball grid arrays patterned on the organicsubstrates. This stack allows electrical connection from the PCB to thePIC components.

With renewed reference to FIG. 9, the PICs with integrated wavelengthlockers may be mass-manufactured by creating large numbers of themsimultaneously on a single semiconductor wafer in a regular arrangement(e.g., a square grid). Following creation of the PICs (act 902 and,optionally, act 904), the wafer is singulated into dies (or chips)corresponding to the individual PICs, e.g., by dicing along the gridlines (906). Electronic control chips including memory and processingcircuitry for processing the optical interference signals may be createdindependently from the PICs (act 908); suitable manufacturing processesfor electronic integrated circuits are well-known to those of ordinaryskill in the art. The PIC and electronic control chip may then beassembled into a multi-chip module or package. For instance, asschematically shown in FIG. 10D, the PIC 1060 and electronic controlchip 1062 may be bonded side-by-side to a unifying multi-chip substrate1064 (act 910). In some embodiments, the PIC 1060 and electronic controlchip 1062 are flip-chip attached to the substrate 1064, that is, theyare mounted face-down and aligned such that solder bumps on pad metalsof the chips are brought in contact with electrical connectors on themulti-chip substrate. In other embodiments, the PIC 1060 and electroniccontrol chip 1062 are mounted face-up on the substrate 1064, andelectrical connections are made through wire-bonding. Assembly of thePIC 1060 on the multi-chip substrate 1064 often results in strainchanges in the wavelength locker.

Once the multi-chip integrated wavelength locker module has beenassembled, it is ready for testing and calibration of the wavelengthlocker (act 912). For this purpose, the multi-chip substrate 1064 may befit into a mating socket of a fixed-temperature test bed. Calibrationmay utilize an external reference laser operating at the wavelength ofinterest to couple light into the wavelength locker. Alternatively,light from the on-chip light source may be power-split, and one portionmay be sent to the wavelength locker while the other portion may berouted off-chip to an external passive wavelength filter (e.g.,Fabry-Perot filter) or high-resolution wavelength measurement system(e.g., a more complex spectrometer); this allows tuning the on-chiplight source to the wavelength of interest and then calibrating thewavelength locker to the on-chip light source. Either way, the light ismeasured on the photodetectors of the wavelength locker. In someembodiments, the measured photocurrents or one or more filter parameters(such as a target filter phase) computed therefrom, are stored in theon-chip memory. Alternatively, in embodiments with a heater (or similaractive tuning element), that heater is tuned until the measuredphotocurrents have reached the desired values (e.g., until a measuredbalanced photocurrent is substantially zero), and the correspondingheater setting (e.g., heater power) is stored in the on-chip memory. Theresistance values of the temperature sensor and strain gauge (ifpresent) are likewise stored in the memory. Following successfulcalibration, the multi-chip module is assembled onto a PCB orhigh-density interconnection substrate (act 914) to form an opticalassembly suitable for integration into the device where it is ultimatelyemployed (such as, e.g., a data center transceiver, a telecommunicationstransceiver, fiber-optic router, a sensor system, or a medical laser).The PCB may include, for example, connectors for input/output signals ofthe optical assembly, circuitry to create power supplies of differentvoltages from a single-voltage off-chip source, and/or one or morecapacitors. Assembly on the PCB can, again, change the strain in thewavelength locker; to the extent the PIC includes a strain gauge, anysuch change can be computationally compensated for as described above.Testing and calibration immediately following integration of the PIC andelectronic control chip into the multi-chip module (which is the firsttime all components of the wavelength locker are assembled), prior tocompletion of assembly on the PCB, serves to discover and eliminate anydevices that fail as early in the manufacturing process as possible tolimit cost.

Example Embodiments

Having described different aspects and features of wavelength lockersand associated methods of manufacture and use, the following numberedexamples are provided as illustrative embodiments.

1. A system comprising: an integrated photonic circuit (PIC) comprisinga tunable light source, and a wavelength locker comprising an asymmetricMach-Zehnder interferometer (AMZI) with an output coupler having aplurality of output ports and, placed at the plurality of output ports,a plurality of respective photodetectors for measuring respectiveoptical interference signals exiting the plurality of output ports whenlight is coupled from the light source into the AMZI, wherein the outputcoupler and the plurality of photodetectors are configured as a coherentreceiver in which relative phase shifts imparted between two signalsbeing interfered to form the optical interference signals differ betweenat least two of the output ports by a value that is not a multiple of180°; memory storing one or more target filter parameters associatedwith a specified locking frequency of the light source; and electronicprocessing circuitry configured to compute one or more filter parametersfrom the measured optical interference signals and tune a frequency ofthe light source until the one or more computed filter parameters matchthe one or more target filter parameters.

2. The system of example 1, wherein the AMZI and the plurality ofphotodetectors form a first filter, the wavelength locker furthercomprising a second filter including a second AMZI with an outputcoupler having a plurality of output ports and a second plurality ofrespective photodetectors placed at the output ports, the output couplerof the second AMZI and the second plurality of photodetectors beingconfigured as a second coherent receiver, wherein a filter period of thefirst filter is greater than a filter period of the second filter and afrequency error of the first filter is smaller than the filter period ofthe second filter.

3. The system of example 2, wherein the filter period of the firstfilter is at least five times greater than the filter period of thesecond filter.

4. The system of anyone of examples 1-3, wherein the wavelength lockeris capable of locking the frequency of the light source within 50 GHz orless.

5. The system of example 4, wherein the wavelength locker is capable oflocking the frequency of the light source across a range of at least 200GHz.

6. The system of any one of examples 1-5, wherein the output coupler hasfour output ports and the wavelength locker comprises four respectivephotodetectors, and wherein the output coupler and the fourphotodetectors are configured as a 90-degree hybrid optical receivermeasuring balanced in-phase and quadrature signals.

7. The system of any one of examples 1-5, wherein the output ports andthe respective photodetectors form a plurality of balanced receiverpairs.

8. The system of any one of examples 1-7, wherein the PIC and anelectronic control chip including the memory and the electronicprocessing circuitry are bonded to a single substrate to form amulti-chip module.

9. The system of any one of examples 1-8, wherein the AMZI is athermal.

10. The system of any one of examples 1-9, wherein the wavelength lockerfurther comprises at least one of a temperature sensor for measuring atemperature of the AMZI or a strain gauge for measuring a strain in theAMZI, wherein the electronic processing circuitry is configured toadjust the one or more target filter parameters based on a measuredtemperature or strain, or wherein the memory stores multipletemperature-dependent or strain-dependent sets of target filterparameters.

11. A method for locking a frequency of a light source of a photonicintegrated circuit using an integrated wavelength locker comprising anAMZI, the method comprising: coupling light from the light source intothe AMZI at an input of the AMZI; measuring, at an output of the AMZI, aplurality of optical interference signals each resulting frominterference of two signals, wherein a relative phase shift impartedbetween the two interfering signals differs between at least two of theoptical interference signals by a value that is not a multiple of 180°;determining one or more filter parameters from the measured opticalinterference signals; and tuning a frequency of the light source untilthe determined one or more filter parameters match one or morecorresponding stored target filter parameters associated with aspecified locking frequency.

12. The method of example 11, wherein the AMZI forms part of a firstfilter, the wavelength locker comprising a second filter with a secondAMZI, a filter period of the second AMZI being smaller than a filterperiod of the first AMZI, the frequency of the light source being tunedwith the first filter to match the one or more stored target filterparameters within a margin of error corresponding to a frequency errorno greater than the filter period of the second AMZI, the method furthercomprising, following coarse-tuning the frequency of the light sourcewith the first filter, fine-tuning the frequency of the light sourcewith the second filter by: coupling light from the light source into thesecond AMZI at an input of the second AMZI; measuring, at an output ofthe second AMZI, a plurality of optical interference signals eachresulting from interference of two signals, wherein a relative phaseshift imparted between the two interfering signals differs between atleast two of the optical interference signals by a value that is not amultiple of 180°; determining one or more filter parameters of thesecond AMZI from the measured optical interference signals; and tuningthe frequency of the light source until the one or more determinedfilter parameters of the second AMZI match one or more correspondingstored target filter parameters of the second AMZI within a margin oferror corresponding to a frequency error smaller than the frequencyerror associated with the first filter.

13. The method of example 11 or example 12, wherein the measured opticalinterference signals comprise in-phase and quadrature signals.

14. The method of any one of examples 11-13, wherein the measuredoptical interference signals comprise pairs of balanced signals.

15. The method of any one of examples 11-14, further comprisingmeasuring at least one of a temperature of the AMZI or a strain in theAMZI, and adjusting the one or more target filter parameters based onthe measured temperature or strain prior to comparison with the one ormore filter parameters determined from the measured optical interferencesignals.

16. The method of any one of examples 11-15, wherein the frequency ofthe light source is locked within 50 GHz or less.

17. A method of manufacturing a multi-chip integrated wavelength lockermodule, the method comprising: on a semiconductor substrate, creating aphotonic integrated circuit (PIC) comprising a tunable light source anda wavelength locker, the wavelength locker comprising an asymmetricMach-Zehnder interferometer (AMZI) with an output coupler having aplurality of output ports and, placed at the plurality of output ports,a plurality of respective photodetectors for measuring respectiveoptical interference signals exiting the at least two output ports whenlight is coupled from the light source into the AMZI, wherein the outputcoupler and the plurality of photodetectors are configured as a coherentreceiver in which relative phase shifts imparted between two signalsbeing interfered to form the optical interference signals differ betweenat least two of the output ports by a value that is not a multiple of180°; creating an electronic control chip including memory andprocessing circuitry configured to compute a filter phase from themeasured optical interference signals and tune a frequency of the lightsource until the computed filter phase matches a target filter phasecorresponding to a specified locking frequency; and bonding the PIC andthe electronic control chip to a common substrate to form the multi-chipintegrated wavelength locker module.

18. The method of example 17, further comprising calibrating thewavelength locker by: providing a reference signal having the specifiedlocking frequency to an input of the AMZI, measuring opticalinterference signals at the plurality of photodetectors and output portof the AMZI and computationally converting the measured opticalinterference signals to a filter phase, and storing the filter phase asthe target filter phase in memory.

19. The method of example 18, wherein the reference signal is providedby an external light source.

20 The method of example 18, wherein the reference signal is provided bythe light source of the PIC following tuning of the light source to thespecified locking frequency using an external wavelength filter.

21. A wavelength locker comprising: an athermal asymmetric Mach-Zehnderinterferometer (AMZI) comprising an input coupler, two waveguide arms,an output coupler providing at least two output ports, and an activetuning element disposed in one of the waveguide arms and configured toadjust an optical-path-length difference between the two waveguide arms;and, placed at the at least two output ports, at least two respectivephotodetectors forming, together with the output coupler, a balancedreceiver.

22. The wavelength locker of example 21, wherein the AMZI and thephotodetectors are integrated in a photonic integrated circuit.

23. The wavelength locker of example 21 or example 22, wherein theactive tuning element comprises a heater.

24. The wavelength locker of any one of examples 21-23, furthercomprising memory storing a target setting of the active tuning elementassociated with a specified locking frequency.

25. The wavelength locker of example 24, further comprising circuitryconfigured to set the active tuning element to the target setting, andto tune a frequency of a light source coupling light into the AMZI,based on a balanced photocurrent measured with the balanced receiver, tobring the balanced photocurrent to substantially zero.

26. The wavelength locker of example 24 or example 25, furthercomprising at least one of a temperature sensor or a strain gauge, thememory storing temperature-dependent or strain-dependent target settingsfor multiple temperatures of the AMZI or multiple levels of strain inthe AMZI, or the wavelength locker further comprising circuitry toadjust the target setting based on a measured temperature or strain.

27. The wavelength locker of any of examples 21-26, wherein the AMZI andthe balanced receiver form a first filter, the wavelength locker furthercomprising a second filter including a second AMZI and a second balancedreceiver, wherein a filter period of the first filter is greater than afilter period of the second filter and a frequency error of the firstfilter is smaller than the filter period of the second filter.

28. The wavelength locker of example 27, wherein a filter period of thefirst filter is at least five times greater than the filter period ofthe second filter.

29. A method for locking a frequency of a light source of a photonicintegrated circuit using an integrated wavelength locker comprising anAMZI with an active tuning element in one interferometer arm, the methodcomprising: coupling light emitted by the light source into the AMZI atan input of the AMZI; adjusting a setting of the active tuning elementto match a target setting stored in memory, the target setting beingassociated with a specified locking frequency; measuring a balancedphotocurrent at an output of the AMZI; and tuning a frequency of thelight source until the measured balanced photocurrent is substantiallyzero.

30. The method of example 29, wherein the active tuning elementcomprises a heater and the setting being adjusted comprises a heaterpower.

31. The method of example 29 or example 30, further comprising measuringat least one of a temperature of the AMZI or a strain in the AMZI, andadjusting the setting of the active tuning element, based on themeasured temperature or strain, prior to tuning the frequency of thelight source to bring the balanced photocurrent to substantially zero.

32. The method of any one of examples 29-31, further comprisingcalibrating the integrated wavelength locker prior to locking thefrequency of the light source by: tuning the frequency of the lightsource, based on an external reference signal having the specifiedlocking frequency, until the frequency of the light source matches thespecified locking frequency; and, while the frequency of the lightsource matches the specified locking frequency, tuning the setting ofthe active tuning element until a balanced photocurrent measured at theoutput of the AMZI is substantially zero, and then storing that settingas the target setting in memory.

33. The method of any one of examples 29-32, wherein the AMZI forms partof a first filter, the wavelength locker comprising a second filter witha second AMZI, a filter period of the second AMZI being smaller than afilter period of the first AMZI, the frequency of the light source beingtuned in the first filter up to a frequency error no greater than thefilter period of the second AMZI, the method further comprising,following coarse-tuning the frequency of the light source with the firstfilter, fine-tuning the frequency of the light source with the secondfilter by: coupling light emitted by the light source into the secondAMZI at an input of the second AMZI; and, while the setting of theactive tuning element match the target setting stored in memory,measuring a second balanced photocurrent at an output of the second AMZIand tuning the frequency of the light source until the measured secondbalanced photocurrent is substantially zero.

34. A method of manufacturing an integrated wavelength locker module,the method comprising: on a semiconductor substrate, creating a PICcomprising a tunable light source and a wavelength locker, thewavelength locker comprising an AMZI with two waveguide arms and abalanced receiver; and depositing a metal above one of the waveguidearms to form an active tuning element for adjusting anoptical-path-length difference between the two waveguide arms.

35. The method of example 34, further comprising: creating an electroniccontrol chip including memory storing a target setting of the activetuning element and processing circuitry configured to tune a frequencyof the light source coupling light into the AMZI, based on a balancedphotocurrent measured with the balanced receiver, to bring the balancedphotocurrent to substantially zero; and bonding the PIC and theelectronic control chip to a common substrate to form the integratedwavelength locker module.

36. The method of example 35, further comprising calibrating theintegrated wavelength locker module by: providing a reference signalhaving a specified locking frequency to an input of the AMZI; and tuninga setting of the active tuning element until a balanced photocurrentmeasured with the balanced receiver is substantially zero, and thenstoring that setting as the target setting in the memory.

37. The method of example 36, wherein the reference signal is providedby an external light source.

38. The method of example 36, wherein the reference signal is providedby the light source of the PIC following tuning of the light source tothe specified locking frequency using an external wavelength filter.

39. The method of any one of examples 36-38, further comprising creatinga strain gauge in the PIC adjacent the AMZI and, following bonding ofthe PIC and the electronic control chip to the common substrate,measuring a strain in the AMZI and storing the measured strain in thememory.

40. The method of any one of examples 36-39, further comprising creatinga temperature sensor in the PIC adjacent the AMZI, wherein calibratingthe integrated wavelength locker module further comprises measuring thetemperature of the AMZI and storing the measured temperature in thememory.

41. A wavelength locker comprising: an athermal asymmetric Mach-Zehnderinterferometer (AMZI) comprising an input coupler, two waveguide arms,and an output coupler having at least two output ports; placed at the atleast two output ports, at least two respective photodetectors formeasuring at least two respective optical interference signals exitingthe at least two output ports; a temperature sensor to measure atemperature of the AMZI and a strain gauge to measure a strain in theAMZI; and circuitry configured to adjust a locking condition based onthe measured temperature and strain, and to tune a frequency of lightcoupled into the AMZI, based on a feedback parameter derived from themeasured optical interference signals, to satisfy the adjusted lockingcondition.

42. The wavelength locker of example 41, wherein the output coupler andthe at least two photodetectors are configured as a coherent receiver inwhich relative phase shifts imparted between two signals beinginterfered to form the optical interference signals differ between atleast two of the output ports by a value that is not a multiple of 180°,and wherein the feedback parameter is a filter phase and the lockingcondition is satisfied if the filter phase matches a target filter phaseassociated with a specified locking frequency, the target filter phasebeing adjusted based on the measured temperature and strain.

43. The wavelength locker of example 41 or example 42, wherein theoutput coupler has four output ports and the wavelength locker comprisesfour respective photodetectors, and wherein the output coupler and thefour photodetectors are configured as a 90-degree hybrid opticalreceiver measuring balanced in-phase and quadrature signals.

44. The wavelength locker of example 41, wherein the AMZI includes inone of the waveguide arms an active tuning element configured to adjustan optical-path-length difference between the two waveguide arms,wherein the at least two photodetectors comprise a pair ofphotodetectors forming a balanced receiver, wherein the feedbackparameter is a balanced photocurrent measured with the balancedreceiver, and wherein the locking condition is satisfied if the balancedphotocurrent is substantially zero when a setting of the active tuningelement matches a target setting associated with a specified lockingfrequency, the target setting being adjusted based on the measuredtemperature and strain.

45. The wavelength locker of any one of examples 41-44, wherein thelocking condition comprises a target parameter, the wavelength lockerfurther comprising memory storing target parameter values or correctioncoefficients for a plurality of temperatures and strains, the circuitryconfigured to select one of the stored target parameter values orcorrection coefficients based on the measured temperature and strain.

46. The wavelength locker of any one of examples 41-45, wherein thelocking condition comprises a target parameter, and wherein thecircuitry is configured to computationally adjust a stored targetparameter value associated with a nominal temperature and a nominalstrain based on the measured temperature and strain using a storedfunctional dependence of the target parameter on temperature and strain.

47. The wavelength locker of any one of examples 41-46, wherein thestrain gauge comprises two resistance temperature detectors made fromtwo respective metals differing in their respective temperaturecoefficients of resistance.

48. A method for locking a frequency of a light source of a photonicintegrated circuit using an integrated wavelength locker comprising anathermal AMZI, the method comprising: coupling light emitted by thelight source into the AMZI at an input of the AMZI; measuring at leasttwo optical interference signals at an output of the AMZI; measuring atemperature of the AMZI and a strain in the AMZI; adjusting a lockingcondition based on the measured temperature and strain; and tuning afrequency of the light, based on a feedback parameter derived from themeasured optical interference signals, to satisfy the adjusted lockingcondition.

49. The method of example 48, further comprising computing a filterphase of the AMZI from the measured optical interference signals, thefilter phase constituting the feedback parameter, wherein the lockingcondition is satisfied by tuning the frequency of the light to cause thefilter phase to match a target filter phase associated with a specifiedlocking condition and adjusted based on the measured temperature andstrain.

50. The method of example 49, wherein the at least two opticalinterference signals comprise balanced in-phase and quadrature signals.

51. The method of example 48, further comprising adjusting a setting ofan active tuning element included in one waveguide arm of the AMZI tomatch a target setting associated with a specified locking frequency andadjusted based on the measured temperature and strain, wherein thefeedback parameter is a balanced photocurrent resulting from the atleast two optical interference signals, and wherein the lockingcondition is satisfied by tuning the frequency of the light to bring thebalanced photocurrent to substantially zero while the setting of theactive tuning element matches the target setting.

52. The method of any one of examples 48-51, wherein adjusting thelocking condition comprises selecting a value of a target parameterincluded in the locking condition, among target parameter values storedfor a plurality of temperature and strains, based on the measuredtemperature and strain.

53. The method of any one of examples 48-51, wherein adjusting thelocking condition comprises computationally adjusting a value of atarget parameter included in the locking condition based on the measuredtemperature and strain using a stored functional dependence of thetarget parameter on temperature and strain.

54. The method of any one of examples 48-53, further comprising, priorto use of the wavelength locker for frequency locking, measuring afilter response of the AMZI at multiple wavelengths and temperatures.

55. A method of manufacturing an integrated wavelength locker module,the method comprising: on a semiconductor substrate, creating a PICcomprising a tunable light source and a wavelength locker, thewavelength locker comprising an AMZI with two waveguide arms and atleast two photodetectors for measuring at least two respective opticalinterference signals at an output of the AMZI; and depositing metalsnear the AMZI to form a strain gauge and a temperature sensor.

56. The method of example 55, wherein, for the strain gauge, two metalshaving different respective temperature coefficients of resistance aredeposited.

57. The method of example 56, wherein the two metals for the straingauge are platinum and nickel-chromium.

58. The method of any one of examples 55-57, wherein, for thetemperature sensor, a metal having a temperature coefficient ofresistance above 1000 ppm/C is deposited.

59. The method of any one of examples 55-58, further comprisingencapsulating the strain gauge and temperature sensor in a dielectric.

60. The method of any one of examples 55-59, further comprising:creating an electronic control chip including memory storing one or moreparameters associated with a locking condition and processing circuitryconfigured to adjust the one or more parameters based on temperature andstrain measurements and to tune a frequency of light coupled into theAMZI, based on a feedback parameter derived from measured opticalinterference signals, to satisfy the locking condition with the adjustedone or more parameters; and bonding the PIC and the electronic controlchip to a common substrate to form the integrated wavelength lockermodule.

Although embodiments have been described with reference to specificexample embodiments, it will be evident that various modifications andchanges may be made to these embodiments without departing from thebroader scope of the disclosure. Accordingly, the specification anddrawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictivesense.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system comprising: an integrated photoniccircuit (PIC) comprising a tunable light source, and a wavelength lockercomprising an asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer (AMZI) with anoutput coupler having a plurality of output ports and, placed at theplurality of output ports, a plurality of respective photodetectors formeasuring respective optical interference signals exiting the pluralityof output ports when light is coupled from the light source into theAMZI, wherein the output coupler and the plurality of photodetectors areconfigured as a coherent receiver in which relative phase shiftsimparted between two signals being interfered to form the opticalinterference signals differ between at least two of the output ports bya value that is not a multiple of 180°; memory storing one or moretarget filter parameters associated with a specified locking frequencyof the light source; and electronic processing circuitry configured tocompute one or more filter parameters from the measured opticalinterference signals and tune a frequency of the light source until theone or more computed filter parameters match the one or more targetfilter parameters.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the AMZI and theplurality of photodetectors form a first filter, the wavelength lockerfurther comprising a second filter including a second AMZI with anoutput coupler having a plurality of output ports and a second pluralityof respective photodetectors placed at the output ports, the outputcoupler of the second AMZI and the second plurality of photodetectorsbeing configured as a second coherent receiver, wherein a filter periodof the first filter is greater than a filter period of the second filterand a frequency error of the first filter is smaller than the filterperiod of the second filter.
 3. The system of claim 2, wherein thefilter period of the first filter is at least five times greater thanthe filter period of the second filter.
 4. The system of claim 1,wherein the wavelength locker is capable of locking the frequency of thelight source within 50 GHz or less.
 5. The system of claim 4, whereinthe wavelength locker is capable of locking the frequency of the lightsource across a range of at least 200 GHz.
 6. The system of claim 1,wherein the output coupler has four output ports and the wavelengthlocker comprises four respective photodetectors, and wherein the outputcoupler and the four photodetectors are configured as a 90-degree hybridoptical receiver measuring balanced in-phase and quadrature signals. 7.The system of claim 1, wherein the output ports and the respectivephotodetectors form a plurality of balanced receiver pairs.
 8. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein the PIC and an electronic control chipincluding the memory and the electronic processing circuitry are bondedto a single substrate to form a multi-chip module.
 9. The system ofclaim 1, wherein the AMZI is athermal.
 10. The system of claim 1,wherein the wavelength locker further comprises at least one of atemperature sensor for measuring a temperature of the AMZI or a straingauge for measuring a strain in the AMZI, wherein the electronicprocessing circuitry is configured to adjust the one or more targetfilter parameters based on a measured temperature or strain, or whereinthe memory stores multiple temperature-dependent or strain-dependentsets of target filter parameters.
 11. A method for locking a frequencyof a light source of a photonic integrated circuit using an integratedwavelength locker comprising an AMZI, the method comprising: couplinglight from the light source into the AMZI at an input of the AMZI;measuring, at an output of the AMZI, a plurality of optical interferencesignals each resulting from interference of two signals, wherein arelative phase shift imparted between the two interfering signalsdiffers between at least two of the optical interference signals by avalue that is not a multiple of 180°; determining one or more filterparameters from the measured optical interference signals; and tuning afrequency of the light source until the determined one or more filterparameters match one or more corresponding stored target filterparameters associated with a specified locking frequency.
 12. The methodof claim 11, wherein the AMZI forms part of a first filter, thewavelength locker comprising a second filter with a second AMZI, afilter period of the second AMZI being smaller than a filter period ofthe first AMZI, the frequency of the light source being tuned with thefirst filter to match the one or more stored target filter parameterswithin a margin of error corresponding to a frequency error no greaterthan the filter period of the second AMZI, the method furthercomprising, following coarse-tuning the frequency of the light sourcewith the first filter, fine-tuning the frequency of the light sourcewith the second filter by: coupling light from the light source into thesecond AMZI at an input of the second AMZI; measuring, at an output ofthe second AMZI, a plurality of optical interference signals eachresulting from interference of two signals, wherein a relative phaseshift imparted between the two interfering signals differs between atleast two of the optical interference signals by a value that is not amultiple of 180°; determining one or more filter parameters of thesecond AMZI from the measured optical interference signals; and tuningthe frequency of the light source until the determined one or morefilter parameters of the second AMZI match one or more correspondingstored target filter parameters of the second AMZI within a margin oferror corresponding to a frequency error smaller than the frequencyerror associated with the first filter.
 13. The method of claim 11,wherein the measured optical interference signals comprise in-phase andquadrature signals.
 14. The method of claim 11, wherein the measuredoptical interference signals comprise pairs of balanced signals.
 15. Themethod of claim 11, further comprising measuring at least one of atemperature of the AMZI or a strain in the AMZI, and adjusting the oneor more target filter parameters based on the measured temperature orstrain prior to comparison with the one or more filter parametersdetermined from the measured optical interference signals.
 16. Themethod of claim 11, wherein the frequency of the light source is lockedwithin 50 GHz or less.
 17. A method of manufacturing a multi-chipintegrated wavelength locker module, the method comprising: on asemiconductor substrate, creating a photonic integrated circuit (PIC)comprising a tunable light source and a wavelength locker, thewavelength locker comprising an asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer(AMZI) with an output coupler having a plurality of output ports and,placed at the plurality of output ports, a plurality of respectivephotodetectors for measuring respective optical interference signalsexiting the plurality of output ports when light is coupled from thelight source into the AMZI, wherein the output coupler and the pluralityof photodetectors are configured as a coherent receiver in whichrelative phase shifts imparted between two signals being interfered toform the optical interference signals differ between at least two of theoutput ports by a value that is not a multiple of 180°; creating anelectronic control chip including memory and processing circuitryconfigured to compute a filter phase from the measured opticalinterference signals and tune a frequency of the light source until thecomputed filter phase matches a target filter phase corresponding to aspecified locking frequency; and bonding the PIC and the electroniccontrol chip to a common substrate to form the multi-chip integratedwavelength locker module.
 18. The method of claim 17, further comprisingcalibrating the wavelength locker by: providing a reference signalhaving the specified locking frequency to an input of the AMZI,measuring optical interference signals at the plurality ofphotodetectors and output port of the AMZI and computationallyconverting the measured optical interference signals to a filter phase,and storing the filter phase as the target filter phase in memory. 19.The method of claim 18, wherein the reference signal is provided by anexternal light source.
 20. The method of claim 18, wherein the referencesignal is provided by the light source of the PIC following tuning ofthe light source to the specified locking frequency using an externalwavelength filter.